Rogers’ positive and reactions to it reflect state cycling is in

by crankpunk. this article originally appeared in The Roar

 

The Saxo-Tinkoff team released the following statement relating to Michael Rogers’ positive doping test on their website on Wednesday evening CET time:

“Today, Michael Rogers has been advised by the UCI that he returned an adverse analytical finding for clenbuterol in an A-sample taken in connection with Japan Cup on the 20th October 2013.

“Michael Rogers immediately informed Saxo-Tinkoff’s management about the notification from the UCI.

“The Australian explained to the team management that he never ingested the substance knowingly nor deliberately and fears that the adverse analytical finding origins from a contaminated food source.

“Michael Rogers participated in Tour of Beijing the week before the Japan Cup and travelled directly from China to Japan.

“Michael Rogers now has the opportunity to request an analysis of his B-sample. According to the team’s Anti Doping policy, Michael Rogers is provisionally suspended with immediate effect.”

Rogers was not the only rider this week to be found to have Clenbuterol in his system. Joining him was Belgium’s Jonathan Breyne (Crelan-Euphony), who rode in the Tour of Taihu Lake, also in China, on November 5.

This is of course the same drug that was found in Alberto Contador’s system and both Rogers and Breyne are claiming, as the Spaniard did, that he ingested the drug unknowingly after eating tainted food.

While Contador’s claim aroused some obvious questions as the drug is not commonly found in beef in Spain, Clenbuterol is known to be used in the meat industry in China. There have been other cases of athletes testing positive for the drug and support from WADA for their own claims that the drug was ingested unknowingly.

In 2011, a study by a WADA-accredited lab in Cologne, Germany, found that 22 of 28 travellers returning from China tested positive for low levels of clenbuterol, “probably from food contamination”.

WADA chief David Howman said at the time that:

“There seems to be some evidence that some beef in China may have been stimulated in their growth by the use of steroids.

“We have written to the Chinese minister to ask for a full explanation of what happens in the industry in China. We’re waiting for a response.”

There’s also precedent of riders having tested positive for the drug after travelling to a country that uses Clenbuterol in cattle being cleared to race soon after. In early 2012 Dutch XC rider Rudi van Houts was cleared after testing positive in 2011.

At that time, Dutch officials decided not to ban Van Houts, yet though he was not acquitted he was found “guilty without punishment”.

However, Chinese rider Fuy Li, then with Radioshack, did receive a two-year ban for the same drug showing up in his system in April 2010. He was furious with the ban, as was the Chinese cycling federation and as were Chinese cycling fans.

However, he does hail from a nation where the Chinese swimming team is banned from eating beef in their own nation. It’s worth noting too that in 2011 WADA released a statement warning riders to take care when travelling to Mexico and China, lest they eat contaminated beef.

And so what exactly is the attitude of the authorities to cyclists claiming that they ingested Clenbuterol-infected beef unwittingly?

As the case of the Dutch rider van Houts and the cases of Li and Contador showed, it is one that is difficult to work out.

For example, though Van Houts was not made to serve a full suspension, when Contador received his ban, WADA president John Fahey said:

“Every time a cheat is caught out, the decision is very good news for anti-doping, no matter what discipline he practices or which flag he defends.”

Rogers is not new to controversy over doping-related matters, which is also worth noting.

In May 2011, Rogers was included on the leaked UCI report that ranked riders according to the level of suspicion with which the UCI regarded them.

He was placed in a category that said that the riders included showed “overwhelming evidence of some kind of doping, due to recurring anomalies, enormous variations in parameters, and even the identification of doping products or methods”.

Rogers also left Team Sky for Tinkoff, a move that coincided with the team management requesting all riders and staff to sign an agreement saying they had never doped.

7829_l

Rogers claimed the move was for financial reasons, and it is best not to speculate on that, but, at the same time, it should be noted.

So, where does this leave the fans? Further in the mire, one could argue.

As ever, I hope that these riders did indeed ingest the drug unknowingly, and there are precedents for this having happened before, but this is a sport in which riders have shown themselves willing to take banned substances to get ahead time after time.

Might a rider be tempted to take Clenbuterol knowing that they are going to or in a nation where there is a history of tainted beef?

Cycling, as with life, tells that anything is possible.

That we simply can not be sure about anything these days is a sign of where our beloved sport currently resides in relation to banned substances.

And as cases like that of Stuart O’Grady prove, we simply can no longer be sure about anything other than the fact that we can be sure of nothing.

What will the outcome be? With Brian Cookson and the UCI looking to send a clear message to riders, sponsors and fans about doping and their eagerness to tackle the issue more firmly that in MacQuaid’s day, a ban for both riders looks on the cards.

5 comments

  1. wayne

    If it’s a known fact that meat is contaminated in that country, then they should drop the case, and let the riders carry on, there’s nothing worse than a cyclist passion for the sport to be destroyed.
    If he’s not guilty then drop the case, don’t drag it out …

    • crankpunk

      alternatively, don’t eat beef in that country and be aware that every rider bears responsibility for what is in his system at all times. if you just scrap the law for China, anyone there or going there could abuse the drug.

  2. MikeB

    The european horsemeat scandal proved that you cannot be certain of the origin, content or even species of meat. Every supermarket was victim to meat products containing banned horsemeat from a wide range of origin countries and the supply chain is so complex it is almost impossible to know. In europe at least it is possible to buy good grade meat and actually be eating something else completely, from countries in origin both inside ant out of eu. in the far east it is bound to be worse.

    I pity the cyclists that have to take such decisions.

  3. P K

    As a racer over in that part of the world, what do you do if anything to avoid this kind of thing? you never eat beef? Taiwanese meat is safe? are low-level positives for Clenbuturol a common occurance? Should Richard Meeker start importing chinese beef?

  4. MikeB

    Buy as close in the supply chain as you can, preferably straight from a farm shop? Avoid all processed meat?
    Hard to know. But for a year over here the stories kept coming and There was almost no part of the food supply chain unaffected. For people like me who just ride for the love of it, and being out in wild country , feeling the wind rush by, and never race – we are lucky it does not affect us. Had bertie had problems last year in europe, I doubt if the charges could have stuck, there would have been outrage. ( assuming again they would not allow Ashenden to present the bag plasticiser evidence, another story!)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s